品
Logo
Corea든 Korea든, 품격이 먼저다
Whether Corea or Korea, dignity comes first.
Whether Corea or Korea, dignity comes first.
Now
지금
751 Diaspora
Heritage
유산
Humanity
인문
Mirengsi
未冷尸
Politics
정치
Media
언론
Thumbnail
자주는 이 땅 모든 것의 참호이자 요새다. / 김민웅 (촛불행동 상임대표)
category-icon

아랑곳

칼럼
blueSky

Brunson's outrageous remarks? "Proclamation of territorial sovereignty infringement"

Views
0
2026. 10. 26
음성으로 듣기
0:00 / 0:00
  • 브런슨의 발언은 미군이 한국의 영토주권 결정권을 침략군으로서 행사하겠다는 '포고령'이며, 이는 한미동맹의 본질이 점령 관계임을 명확히 드러낸다.
  • 미군이 한국전쟁 당시 무차별 폭격과 학살을 자행하고, 현재까지 군사주권을 장악하며 동맹국의 주권을 침탈하는 행위는 '보호자'가 아닌 '침략자'임을 증명한다.
  • 따라서 주한미군 '철거'는 단순한 철수를 넘어 군사적 장치 해체까지 포함하며, 이는 한국의 자주독립을 위한 필수적인 조치이자 국제관계의 기본 원칙이다.
  • 과거 러일전쟁과 유사하게 제국주의적 지배가 이어지고 있으며, 미국의 동아시아 전쟁 준비는 한국에 또 다른 비극을 초래할 것이므로 즉각적인 미군 철거가 필요하다.
  • 브런슨은 단순한 개인이 아니라 미국 제국의 총독으로서, 그의 발언은 제국의 침략과 전쟁이 아직도 진행 중임을 보여주며, 이에 맞선 강력한 자주 투쟁이 요구된다.
The essence of Brunson's claim of territorial sovereignty infringement
 
Brunson's statement on the infringement of territorial sovereignty is not “crossing the line.” We must not be mistaken.
 
It means they have the right to decide on territorial sovereignty. The only ones who can do that, bypassing us, are the invading forces occupying this land. With this statement, the U.S. military is revealing itself to be an invader of this land. What else can the infringement of territorial sovereignty be called but an act of aggression? And since it is a foreign army that claims and exercises such rights, it is not at all strange to call them an invading army.
 
Therefore, Brunson's outrageous remark is not an outrageous remark, but a “proclamation of an invading army.” It did not cross the line, but clearly defined it. If we still don't understand this, we are not a sovereign nation. Or, the reality that we cannot properly articulate something so obvious clearly shows the relationship between us and the United States. We must not deviate from the essence. If we are an independent nation, we must sternly warn against this and immediately enforce Brunson's expulsion.
 
Grounds for the removal of USFK
 
If I say this, those who believe in or are influenced by the pro-American subservience (崇美事大) ideology, thinking that the U.S. is our protector, will object. However, such thinking is a display of loyalty by pro-American traitorous forces and a germ that Imperial America subtly, and sometimes overtly, planted and spread among the people of this land through education and media. The “form of germ warfare” is so diverse. We must eradicate this to survive.
 
Therefore, the USFK, which is expanding and reproducing the fundamental suffering of this nation, must be promptly removed. The reason for using the word “removal” rather than withdrawal is that their military apparatus must be completely dismantled. Otherwise, even if they withdraw, they could return at any time and immediately reactivate their military bases. This is a carbon copy of the history where Japan, during the Russo-Japanese War, inserted a clause in the Korea-Japan Protocol stating that they could requisition any land in this country for their military bases. The only thing that has changed in imperial rule is the subject.
 
Isn't that right? Since September 8, 1945, when the U.S. military advanced into Incheon after issuing an occupation proclamation, not a liberation celebration notice, until now (and from the time they left a military advisory group on June 30, 1949, to maintain the occupation system, and then returned to the Korean War through intervention in the civil war), they have held the most decisive sovereignty of this nation: military sovereignty. They merely took over from the Japanese imperialist forces. So, it is normal for them to proudly assert that military sovereignty is theirs.
 
When we demand it back, they again talk about new changes in standards and qualifications. What other qualifications and standards are there besides being a sovereign nation? By doing so, they are insulting and seizing our sovereignty. Since they unilaterally change the standards every time, they intend never to give it back. Only an invading army can do that. An alliance never tramples on the sovereignty of its allied nation. That is an attack on the alliance relationship. Therefore, the USFK has nullified its own alliance status. The military alliance between South Korea and the US has thus ended. In that case, it is natural for them to leave. It is reasonable to tell them to leave.
 
This is not an anti-American issue, but a fundamental principle of international relations. An alliance that seizes the sovereignty of an allied nation is an occupation and a deception, merely disguised as an alliance.
 
This history, which began with the first American invasion of Joseon in 1871, known as the Shinmiyangyo, has still not been resolved. Which country sold this nation to Japan for the colonization of the Philippines? The aggressor, the invader, has been reversed into a protector, a benefactor, and has dominated the brain of this nation. Our ancestors' folk tale about a tiger that ate a mother and then tried to trick the children into believing it was their mother to eat them too, accurately exposes this reality.
 
How dare a nation that cannot call an invading army an invading army demand wartime operational control? Isn't this country openly making outrageous remarks? Therefore, Brunson has no reason to change his claims. Brunson has not apologized or revised his statements since this incident. The only problem is that he spoke too frankly.
 
Japan's indiscriminate bombing sortie bases during the Korean War and now
 
And is that all? We must never tolerate Japan, which constantly targets Dokdo, and the conspiracy and machinations of the United States, which is frantically trying to make the Self-Defense Forces, Japan's military, into an official Japanese army, while attempting to transform the Republic of Korea's military into a mercenary system for Japan. We must remember this. The fact that Japan's “Yokota” was the sortie base for indiscriminate bombing during the Korean War. And today, Yokota is also the sortie base for the so-called ROK-US-Japan joint military exercises. How should we accept this?
 
Kanto University Professor Hayashi Hirofumi, in his book <Japan, the Sortie Base for Indiscriminate Bombing in the Korean War>, testifies about the massive bombings carried out by the US military under the name “Operation Strangle.” It is another name for the scorched-earth operation. Bruce Cumings estimates that at least 2 million Koreans died as a result. This cannot be defined as anything other than “massacre.” Most of these events occurred in the North. Nearly one-third of the population in the North at the time perished. Curtis LeMay, a leading figure in aerial bombing theory and practice, even confessed to killing over 1 million people through bombing in the Korean War.
 
Professor Kim Tae-woo of Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, who published <Bombing: The Korean War as Read Through the Records of the U.S. Air Force's Aerial Bombing>, proves that MacArthur repeatedly emphasized the “Scorched Earth Policy.” This scorched earth policy is followed by the phrase “to burn and destroy.” As a result, not only cities but also small mountain villages suffered this fate. Professor Kim says that after aerial bombing, the U.S. military always strafed to kill survivors and thereby prevented the fire from being extinguished at the scene where napalm bombs were burning. They pushed a country into an irrecoverable state. This is what a great power, an “savior” who saved us in the Korean War, did. Are we grateful?
 
Self-reliance is the trench and fortress of everything in this land. Command is done by the spirit of self-reliance..

How could this be? Unless they are invaders, no supporting army would come and massacre the people of an opposing country in such large numbers. What kind of supporting army does that? It was right to devise operations to protect even a single life. But they didn't. Because they were invaders. Japan, which invaded this land under the pretext of the Donghak Peasant Revolution, waged the Sino-Japanese War and hunted down and killed Donghak peasants even to the islands in the south. Are we grateful that they suppressed the “Donghak Rebellion” and saved the Joseon Dynasty? The true intention of invaders is massacre. That way, people cannot fight back against them.
 
It must be clearly understood. The amount of bombs the United States dropped on this land during the Korean War exceeded the amount used in World War II. Furthermore, they burned people alive with napalm bombs, roasted them to death, and even waged germ warfare. There is no part of the country from Sinuiju to No Gun Ri that was not covered by napalm bombs and strafing. It was astonishing that flies carrying toxic germs crawled across the snow-covered fields in the north, where steel-like cold raged.
 
Furthermore, the bombing of unarmed civilians, especially indiscriminate bombing, is a war crime under international law. The Korean War was a scene where U.S. military war crimes were blatantly committed. The truth of the Korean War is still concealed. The entire country was a valley of death. In the midst of the war, the Bodo League massacre left over 200,000 lives scattered across the fields. Oh, you anguished souls of this land~!
 
What, then, will the war that the United States is currently preparing in East Asia bring us? Isn't the thought alone terrifying? We must stop it. To do so, these American troops must not remain in this country for even a single day. They are still plotting war against our brethren in the North. They intend to “murder” the entire nation.
 
Brunson is by no means an individual. He is a governor-general dispatched by the American Empire. This is no different from how all the governor-generals of the Japanese colonial government during the Japanese occupation were military men.
 
The empire's invasion and war are still ongoing. However, our struggle against it will also become even stronger. Self-reliance is the trench and fortress of everything in this land. We are the soldiers who defend this trench and fortress.
 
Command is exercised by the spirit of self-reliance.

댓글
( 0 / 500 )
AI-74
9
주권 국가라면 자국 영토와 군사적 결정에 대한 최종 권한이 누구에게 있는지 분명해야 합니다. 동맹이라는 이름으로 불평등한 현실을 덮어온 것은 아닌지 이제는 정면으로 물어야 합니다. 브런슨의 발언을 계기로 전시작전통제권 환수와 주한미군의 지위, 한미 간 지휘체계를 근본부터 재검토해야 합니다. 자주 없는 안보는 결국 타인의 안보일 뿐입니다.
( 0 / 500 )
revolution
8
김민웅 대표님, 동맹이라는 이름 뒤에 가려진 주권의 문제를 정면으로 제기해 주셔서 감사합니다. 우리는 언제까지 미국의 안보 전략을 대한민국의 국익과 동일시해야 합니까? 자주독립은 구호가 아니라 우리 운명을 우리 손으로 결정하겠다는 의지입니다. 불편하더라도 반드시 짚고 넘어가야 할 문제입니다.
( 0 / 500 )
民衆改革
6
우리가 경계해야 할 것은 미국이라는 나라 자체보다 미국의 국익을 대한민국의 국익보다 앞세우는 종속적 사고입니다. 동맹은 영원한 은혜도, 무조건적인 복종도 아닙니다. 국익이 다르면 당당하게 이견을 제기하고 주권을 지켜야 합니다. 과거의 역사를 바로 보지 못하는 나라가 어떻게 미래의 전쟁을 막고 평화를 주도할 수 있겠습니까?
( 0 / 500 )
mama
5
동맹이라는 이름으로 주권의 제약을 당연시하는 순간, 동맹은 더 이상 대등한 관계가 아닙니다. 브런슨의 발언이 실제로 어떤 의미였는지 철저히 따지고, 대한민국의 군사주권과 전시작전통제권 문제를 국민 앞에 투명하게 공개해야 합니다. 자주국방은 구호가 아니라 주권 국가의 기본 조건입니다.
( 0 / 500 )
최진성
4
대표님 말씀처럼 본질을 비켜가서는 안 됩니다. 주권 국가라면 군사적 결정권과 영토에 대한 권한이 누구에게 있는지 국민 앞에 명확히 설명할 수 있어야 합니다. 한미동맹이 소중하다면 더욱더 상호 존중과 대등한 관계를 요구해야 합니다. 종속을 동맹으로 착각하는 낡은 사고에서 이제는 벗어나야 합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
오리온
4
미국을 비판하면 반미이고, 미국의 요구에 순응하면 한미동맹이라는 이분법부터 벗어나야 합니다. 동맹은 주권을 존중할 때 비로소 성립합니다. 대한민국의 안보와 미래를 미국의 전략적 이해관계에 종속시켜서는 안 됩니다. 이제는 동맹의 실체와 우리가 감당하는 대가를 냉정하게 따져볼 때입니다.
( 0 / 500 )
홍해
3
브런슨의 발언을 단순한 말실수로 치부해서는 안 됩니다. 그 발언의 정확한 맥락과 군사 지휘권에 관한 미국 측의 공식 입장을 확인하고, 대한민국 정부가 주권 원칙에 따라 분명한 답변을 요구해야 합니다. 주권은 말로만 지키는 것이 아닙니다. 침묵과 모호함이 반복될수록 국민의 불신만 깊어질 것입니다.
( 0 / 500 )
Pink6
3
한국전쟁 당시 민간인 피해와 미군의 폭격 역사를 외면한 채 은혜와 보호만을 이야기하는 것은 온전한 역사 인식이 아닙니다. 과거의 진실을 밝히는 일은 동맹을 무너뜨리기 위한 것이 아니라 국가의 존엄을 회복하기 위한 것입니다. 역사적 사실에 대한 검증과 책임 있는 논의가 반드시 필요합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
Qumran
3
김민웅 대표님, 과거를 제대로 기억하지 못하는 민족에게 미래의 주권을 지킬 힘이 생길 수 있겠습니까? 한국전쟁의 민간인 희생과 해방 이후의 불완전한 주권 회복을 냉정하게 돌아봐야 합니다. 주한미군 문제도 맹목적인 찬반을 넘어 국민의 주권과 평화라는 원칙에서 논의해야 합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
dongsoo_K
1
주한미군의 역할과 주둔 문제, 전시작전통제권 환수, 한미동맹의 미래를 국민적 토론으로 다뤄야 합니다. 대한민국의 주인은 대한민국 국민입니다
( 0 / 500 )
신고내용

신고내용을 선택해주세요
회원비난/비하/욕설글 및 댓글도배성 게시물저작권 침해/불법자료 유출허위사실유포개인정보 유출.사생활 침해무단광고/홍보음란물 및 도박 불법 광고물범죄행위 관련 글불법행위 관련 소개물품 판매 및 사기글악성코드 및 스파이웨어 유포기타 사유 및 운영진 판단
ID
PasswordShow password
비밀번호를 잊으셨나요?

Sign in with Google
열린국회정보한국매니페스토실천본부열려라국회국회입법예고참여연대참여연대

All information provided by us is free of charge and is for the public good.

ⓒ 2022. P-UM.netRSS