品
Logo
Corea든 Korea든, 품격이 먼저다
Whether Corea or Korea, dignity comes first.
Whether Corea or Korea, dignity comes first.
Now
지금
751 Diaspora
Heritage
유산
Humanity
인문
Mirengsi
未冷尸
Politics
정치
Media
언론
Thumbnail
국정조사는 탄핵과정이 되어야 / 김민웅 (촛불행동 상임대표) 2026년 10월 28일
category-icon

단상斷想

칼럼
blueSky

The end of the Cho Hee-dae parliamentary inquiry is impeachment

Views
0
2026. 10. 30
음성으로 듣기
0:00 / 0:00
음성 변환 진행 중입니다...
  • The decision for a parliamentary inquiry into Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae is a result of sustained pressure from those condemning the "judicial rebellion," but there's dissatisfaction with its pace, urging a thorough and swift investigation.
  • The parliamentary inquiry must establish clear grounds for Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's impeachment and inform the public, emphasizing that sufficient impeachment reasons are already documented, and demanding attorney Kim Kyung-ho's appearance as a witness.
  • An inquiry without an impeachment conclusion would effectively exonerate Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae; thus, the Democratic Party must approach it fiercely with an impeachment resolution and seek ways to overcome the inquiry's limitations.
  • Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's impeachment will be a critical turning point, not just for judicial reform but for rectifying the wrongs of 80 years of judicial history, and it can only succeed if combined with the sovereign people's candlelight struggle.
A parliamentary investigation into Cho Hee-dae will be conducted. From the perspective of the sovereign people who have been demanding and ordering Cho Hee-dae's impeachment for over a year, there is great regret that the process is too slow. The question and lament is, how long has it been since the judicial rebellion, and only now is a parliamentary investigation being conducted?
 
However, if it has been decided to proceed this way, it must be done thoroughly, powerfully, and quickly. This parliamentary investigation into Cho Hee-dae, along with the issuance of an arrest warrant for Kim Keon-hee, is also a result of the struggle and pressure from the sovereign people. Otherwise, Cho Hee-dae would have acted recklessly, and the Democratic Party would still be procrastinating.
 
The judicial rebellion forces, Cho Hee-dae and his associates, are carrying out a military operation, but the ruling party's response has not been commensurate. However, if the purpose of the parliamentary investigation is to clearly identify the grounds for impeachment and to inform the public more precisely, then this can be accepted as part of the impeachment process itself. And it must be so. Even if the initial intention was not so, it will become a process leading to that outcome.
 
Cho Hee-dae's impeachment grounds are already documented; call lawyer Kim Kyung-ho.
 
As the Democratic Party has already mentioned, the grounds for Cho Hee-dae's impeachment were abundant and overflowing. However, the fact that they are only now trying to solidify those grounds is not very convincing. It means they were negligent in impeaching Cho Hee-dae. Why haven't they properly utilized the abundant and overflowing reasons until now?
 
Even with such points, I hope that from now on, every day and everywhere, they will publicly and more clearly present the grounds for why this person should be impeached, pursue the matter, and definitely move towards an impeachment conclusion. The change in the political situation will be felt throughout the body.
 
The grounds for impeachment by Candlelight Action and other political parties are already precisely documented. They have been prepared for a long time. In particular, I hope that lawyer Kim Kyung-ho will be called to the parliamentary investigation process. He will convincingly and instantly prove the clear grounds with eloquence that no one can oppose.
 
A parliamentary investigation into Cho Hee-dae without an impeachment conclusion could become a platform to grant him absolution.
 
On the other hand, if a parliamentary investigation into Jo Hee-dae is conducted but no impeachment follows, it will truly become a ridiculous situation. This is because it would ultimately legitimize Jo Hee-dae's destruction of the constitution and laws. We must not allow this to result in giving Jo Hee-dae a free pass, must we?
 
Therefore, the Democratic Party, when participating in the parliamentary investigation, must fiercely push forward with a resolution to impeach Jo Hee-dae. It must never be a case of simply doing enough to appease public opinion on impeachment and thinking that's sufficient. It seems unlikely that Jo Hee-dae will appear for the parliamentary investigation. Doubts remain about the effectiveness of a parliamentary investigation without investigative powers. Consider ways to overcome these limitations. If this person does not attend the National Assembly, then it should be done at the site where Jo Hee-dae goes to work.
 
Furthermore, Jo Hee-dae has already been reported to the Serious Crimes Investigation Agency. This must become the agency's first case. This point must also be kept in mind and emphasized to prevent a serious criminal from becoming the head of this nation's judiciary, and to stop this person and their cronies from orchestrating a rebellion after the initial one and opening a history of reaction.
 
Only impeachment combined with the struggle of the sovereign people will succeed.
 
So, let's see the ruling party's skill in this parliamentary investigation this time. If they do it properly, the criticisms and dissatisfactions so far will be added to the momentum for impeachment. I strongly urge that all internal critics of backlash theories, those who argue against the necessity of Jo Hee-dae's impeachment, and defeatists are silenced throughout this process. Demonstrate the effectiveness to shut down the media's arguments against impeachment and the mouths of opponents.
 
The eradication of the Jo Hee-dae judiciary, which has become the stronghold of the rebellion forces, will not only achieve judicial reform but also a decisive phase in eradicating the rebellion. This is the way to properly establish the history of 80 years of pro-Japanese treason and complicity with dictatorship in the judiciary.
 
The candlelight sovereign citizens, who have been relentlessly fighting to thoroughly suppress the rebellion, will gather without fail this Saturday in front of the Supreme Court in Seocho-dong to bring Jo Hee-dae's impeachment to a conclusion. We earnestly request the people who passionately desire to create a world without rebellion to join us.
 
Ultimately, we will succeed. Historical progress is only possible on the foundation of sovereign struggle. The impeachment of Jo Hee-dae must be combined with the struggle of the sovereign people to succeed. The Constitutional Court's ruling is also an extension of this.
 
This is a great law of history.

댓글
( 0 / 500 )
alpha_k
8
국정조사의 목적은 단순히 과거의 잘못을 확인하는 데 있지 않습니다. 드러난 사실에 책임을 묻고 헌정질서를 바로 세우는 데까지 나아가야 합니다. 탄핵이라는 후속 조치가 없다면 국정조사 자체가 정치적 면죄부로 전락할 수 있다는 지적을 무겁게 받아들여야 합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
gongjoo
7
지난 시간 동안 국민들이 요구한 것은 분명했습니다. 사법부의 독립은 존중하되, 그 독립이 권력자의 책임을 면제하는 방패가 되어서는 안 된다는 것입니다. 민주당은 국정조사를 통해 의혹을 철저히 검증하고, 위법 사실이 확인되면 헌법과 법률이 정한 절차에 따라 책임을 물어야 합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
iso945
7
김민웅 대표님, 국정조사는 진실을 밝히는 절차이면서 동시에 책임을 묻는 출발점이어야 합니다. 조사만 하고 끝난다면 국민이 요구해 온 사법개혁은 또다시 미완으로 남을 것입니다. 국정조사의 방향과 최종 목표가 분명해야 한다는 말씀에 깊이 공감합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
kangminsoo
4
대표님 말씀처럼 지금 필요한 것은 민주당의 속도와 결단입니다. 국민이 거리에서 외쳐 온 요구를 국회가 뒤늦게 따라가는 모습은 더 이상 반복되어서는 안 됩니다. 국정조사를 통해 사실관계를 명확히 밝히고, 확인된 위법 행위에는 반드시 헌법적 책임을 물어야 합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
Golden
4
국민들이 지켜보는 것은 청문회 장면이나 의원들의 발언이 아닙니다. 조사 결과에 따라 어떤 책임을 묻고 어떤 제도적 변화를 만들어 내느냐입니다. 조사만 하고 끝난다면 국민의 기대를 저버리는 일입니다. 국정조사와 탄핵 절차의 연결 가능성을 처음부터 분명히 해야 합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
pyo2000
4
사법부 독립이라는 원칙이 사법부의 무책임까지 보호하는 방패가 되어서는 안 됩니다. 권력기관일수록 헌법과 법률에 대한 책임이 엄격해야 합니다. 대표님께서 강조하신 국정조사와 탄핵의 연계는 결국 권력도 주권자의 통제 아래 있다는 민주주의의 원칙을 확인하는 문제라고 생각합니다.
( 0 / 500 )
marin88
3
정치적 구호만으로는 사법부의 책임을 물을 수 없습니다. 사건의 경위와 절차적 문제, 헌법 및 법률 위반 여부를 구체적인 자료로 입증해야 합니다. 국민이 납득할 수 있는 조사와 법률적 논증이 뒷받침될 때 탄핵 논의도 정당성과 설득력을 확보할 수 있습니다.
( 0 / 500 )
정민
3
김경호 변호사 등 관련 법률 전문가들의 참여를 강조하신 대목에 주목합니다. 정치적 주장만으로는 국민을 설득할 수 없습니다. 구체적인 증거와 법률적 논거로 잘못을 입증하고, 절차적 정당성을 확보해야 합니다. 그래야 어떤 반론과 정치적 공세에도 흔들리지 않는 개혁의 기반을 만들 수 있습니다.
( 0 / 500 )
Yeongwol
1
조희대에 대한 책임 논의는 사법부를 정치권력 아래 두자는 주장이 되어서는 안 됩니다. 오히려 사법부 역시 헌법 위에 있을 수 없다는 원칙을 확인하는 과정이어야 합니다. 국정조사는 철저하게 진행하고, 탄핵 여부는 확인된 사실과 헌법적 요건에 따라 판단해야 합니다. 그것이 주권자에 대한 책임입니다.
( 0 / 500 )
신고내용

신고내용을 선택해주세요
회원비난/비하/욕설글 및 댓글도배성 게시물저작권 침해/불법자료 유출허위사실유포개인정보 유출.사생활 침해무단광고/홍보음란물 및 도박 불법 광고물범죄행위 관련 글불법행위 관련 소개물품 판매 및 사기글악성코드 및 스파이웨어 유포기타 사유 및 운영진 판단
ID
PasswordShow password
비밀번호를 잊으셨나요?

Sign in with Google
열린국회정보한국매니페스토실천본부열려라국회국회입법예고참여연대참여연대

All information provided by us is free of charge and is for the public good.

ⓒ 2022. P-UM.netRSS