品
Logo
Corea든 Korea든, 품격은 이름보다 먼저다
Whatever the name—Corea or Korea—dignity comes first.
Whatever the name—Corea or Korea—dignity comes first.
Now
지금
751 Diaspora
Heritage
유산
Humanity
인문
Mirengsi
未冷尸
Politics
정치
Media
언론
Thumbnail
category-icon

단상斷想

칼럼
HumanX

The Far-Rightward Shift of Korean Protestantism

Views
0
2025. 04. 21
 
The far-rightward shift of Korean Protestantism has deep historical roots. Korean Protestantism was introduced by American missionaries in the late 19th century. These missionaries belonged to conservative denominations that led the temperance movement in American Protestantism. During the Japanese colonial period, they established medical and educational institutions centered in Seoul and Pyongyang, using them as a means of missionary work to expand their influence. In particular, the Great Revival of 1907 in Pyongyang was successful, and Protestantism spread widely. This inherent background has had a significant impact on the political tendencies and social position of Korean Protestantism ever since.
 
The fundamental problem of Korean Protestantism is revealed from its very beginning. In 1901, when Japan drove the Qing Dynasty out of Joseon and suppressed the Donghak Army, openly invading Joseon, the Presbyterian Council of Joseon adopted a resolution called 'Several Conditions for Fellowship between the Church and the Government,' declaring, 'The church is not a place for national affairs, so we will not interfere with government affairs.' This was a virtual condoning of colonial rule under the guise of political neutrality at a time when national resistance was desperately needed. It can be seen as the starting point of a problematic choice where Protestantism prioritized its own interests over the fate of the nation for political convenience and survival.
 
In particular, through the Taft-Katsura Agreement in 1905, the United States and Japan agreed that the United States would colonize the Philippines and Japan would colonize Korea. Accordingly, when Japan deprived Korea of its diplomatic rights, the United States was the first to withdraw its legation in Seoul, effectively cooperating with Japan's occupation of Korea. In this process, American missionaries also faithfully followed the instructions of their home government and, under the pretext of separation of church and state and non-interference in internal affairs, condoned or even cooperated with Japan's rule of Korea, which is a historical example that clearly shows the discrepancy between the religious values ​​advocated by the missionaries and their actual actions.
 
Even some missionaries who were relatively friendly to Joseon showed a view based on cultural superiority, arguing that Joseon fell into a colony because Joseon people were uncivilized, and therefore, enlightenment movements through Christian missions and education were necessary. This is a clear evidence that the missionary activities of Western missionaries at the time were deeply tied to the ideology of imperialistic expansion and the mission of civilization. The explosive growth of Protestantism in Korea began around the time of the Korean War, when the United States politically and economically dominated Korea. In the process of the US military government ruling South Korea immediately after liberation, a large number of new missionaries entered the country, and existing missionaries who were already well aware of the situation in Joseon participated in the US military government, greatly expanding their political influence. In particular, a significant portion of US aid was distributed disproportionately to Protestant denominations, allowing churches to expand their influence in the process of distributing these materials. Furthermore, some of the aid was directly used to expand church influence, such as church operating expenses, which can be seen as a privilege that seriously undermined the principle of religious fairness.
 
This imbalanced material support and political favoritism became the foundation for establishing the privileged status of Protestantism in Korean society. With the full support of the United States, Methodist Syngman Rhee, who returned from the United States, became the first president, and Protestants seized major ministries. According to Professor Bae Deok-man's research, although the Korean Christian population during the First Republic was less than 5%, 40% of ministerial-level figures were Christians. This statistic clearly shows the unbalanced situation in which Protestants, despite being a numerical minority, seized the center of political power.
 
During the time when American aid sustained the Korean economy, Christianity, which was like the national religion of the United States, received special treatment as if it were the national religion of Korea. The designation of Christmas as a public holiday during this period was not a coincidence but can be seen as institutionalized evidence of the privileged status enjoyed by Protestantism in Korean society. This privilege became even more solidified over time, with Protestants accounting for 43% of executives in listed companies and 120 members of the National Assembly, establishing Protestantism as a de facto ruling group in Korea.
 
In 2002, when President Roh Moo-hyun promoted a policy to reform corruption and privileges of private school foundations before and after the presidential election, Christian forces, who owned 80% of private schools at the time, rapidly intensified political far-rightism in protest. Protestant denominations took to the streets, and pastors staged tonsure struggles, and radical political resistance from the religious community began to be expressed. The June 25th rally in 2003, when the Christian Council of Korea (CCK) joined forces with conservative groups to hold a large-scale rally for the first time, can be said to be a symbolic event that marked the beginning of the politicization of Protestantism in earnest. They distorted differences in political views as a matter of faith and fostered a dangerous dichotomous worldview that defined the opposing forces as 'evil'.
 
This movement abandoned the values of publicity and universality that religion should originally pursue and became the starting point of politicization to protect privileges. In 2003, at a joint rally of the Christian Council of Korea and conservative groups, anti-communist extreme right-wing forces engaged in radical acts such as burning artificial flags. Even government-controlled organizations such as the Korea Freedom Federation and the Korea Veterans Association took notice of the Roh Moo-hyun administration and did not participate in the August 15th 'National Convention Against Nuclear Weapons and Kim Il-sung Commemorating the 55th Anniversary of the Founding of the Nation'. The fact that the Christian Council of Korea also did not participate in the conference due to internal opposition from the denomination can be said to be an example that proves that the political radicalism of the extreme right-wing forces of Protestantism at the time was so serious that it caused concern even within the traditional conservative camp.
 
In particular, the case of Pastor Jeon Kwang-hoon clearly demonstrates the dangerous example of a religious leader being immersed in political extremism. He pushed ahead with the Liberation Day rally even during the COVID-19 situation in 2020, and the results of the search and seizure of Sarang Jeil Church revealed that Pastor Jeon Kwang-hoon's side sent a total of more than 13 million text messages to 1.26 million people to encourage them to attend the Gwanghwamun rally. This was an unethical act that seriously threatened public health and fostered social division. Furthermore, the act of demanding 50 billion won from the redevelopment association where the church building is located and manipulating violent protests behind the scenes to resist the demolition of the building can be said to be an extreme example of completely abandoning moral authority and social responsibility as a religious leader.
 
The phenomenon of conservative Christian megachurch pastors and far-right YouTubers leading rallies against impeachment after the 2024 impeachment attempt of Yoon Seok-yeol shows that the far-right shift of Protestantism is further intensifying. Pastor Jeon Kwang-hoon of Sarang Jeil Church, as an advisor to the Liberty Unification Party, is leading Gwanghwamun rallies with various far-right forces, and Pastor Son Hyun-bo of Busan World Mission Church is leading Yeouido rallies as the head of an organization called Save Korea. In this situation, these far-right religious groups are spreading conspiracy theories such as election fraud and opposition to China, and the fact that this is being exploited in international politics in connection with the United States' strategy against China clearly shows the dangerous situation of religion being reduced to a tool of geopolitical conflict.
 
The phenomenon of the American mainstream, including Christians, Korean experts, and right-wing politicians, subtly supporting Yoon Suk-yeol and the far-right forces while regarding the Democratic Party as pro-China, pro-North Korea, and anti-Japan, suggests that religious conflict is intricately intertwined with international geopolitical conflicts beyond simple domestic political issues, which can be seen as a serious challenge to the healthy pluralism and democratic development of Korean society.
 
The far-right turn of Protestantism abandons universal values such as peace, reconciliation, love, and justice that religion should pursue and serves a specific political ideology or power, which is a serious distortion of the essence of religion. It can be said that Korean Protestantism should return to its original role for social integration and the common good through critical reflection on the privileges and power it has enjoyed.
 
Just as the principle of separation of church and state during the colonial era was in reality an acquiescence to unjust power, today's political intervention should not be a means to maintain specific ideologies and power. Protestants should restore their inherent role for the socially vulnerable and marginalized in accordance with the values of the gospel they claim, which is not simply a problem for Protestants, but an essential task for the healthy pluralism and democratic development of Korean society.


댓글
( 0 / 500 )
고동수
11
정교분리 원칙을 오히려 권력 순응의 도구로 활용했다는 지적, 뼈아프지만 부정할 수 없네요
( 0 / 500 )
Sage72
12
역사적 맥락을 짚어주는 깊이 있는 분석입니다. 종교와 정치의 유착이 어떻게 형성됐는지 다시 생각해보게 되네요
( 0 / 500 )
飛上
7
기독교 전체를 일반화하는 건 위험하지 않나요? 모든 교회나 성도가 저런 정치적 입장을 지지하는 건 아닌데요
( 0 / 500 )
한강
12
기독교의 특권화와 정치세력화가 어떻게 민주주의를 훼손해 왔는지 너무 잘 정리돼 있어요. 이제는 신앙의 이름으로 혐오나 음모론을 퍼뜨리는 일은 멈춰야죠
( 0 / 500 )
Dokdo
13
이 글은 단순한 비판이 아니라, 한국 개신교가 어디서부터 길을 잘못 들었는지를 짚어주는 중요한 역사적 분석이에요. 적극 공감합니다
( 0 / 500 )
blue
9
기독교의 특권화와 정치세력화가 어떻게 민주주의를 훼손해 왔는지 너무 잘 정리돼 있어요. 이제는 신앙의 이름으로 혐오나 음모론을 퍼뜨리는 일은 멈춰야죠
( 0 / 500 )
hongminsoo
3
노무현 정부 시절의 사학법 논란이 기독교 극우화의 계기라는 지적은 흥미롭네요. 당시 상황을 다시 들여다볼 필요가 있습니다
( 0 / 500 )
GoldHunter
8
자유민주주의 국가에서 종교의 정치적 표현이 무조건 나쁜 건 아니죠. 표현의 자유도 중요합니다
( 0 / 500 )
Piter58
4
이 글은 너무 일방적입니다. 진보정권 아래서 탄압받았다고 느낀 개신교인들의 입장도 고려돼야 합니다
( 0 / 500 )
Kvoice17
10
기독교가 사회적 약자보다 권력과 이익을 택했다는 비판, 뼈아프지만 꼭 필요한 성찰이라고 생각합니다. 이런 지적이 많아져야 변화를 기대할 수 있죠
( 0 / 500 )
┖ band89
3
정치화된 종교는 결국 자신들의 신뢰 기반을 무너뜨릴 뿐이에요. 지금이라도 종교 본연의 역할로 돌아가야 할 때입니다
( 0 / 500 )
無名
9
종교가 본래의 역할을 잃고 권력과 결탁하면 얼마나 위험한지, 한국 개신교의 사례가 정확히 보여주고 있네요. 깊이 공감합니다
( 0 / 500 )
minari
6
전광훈 목사와 일부 극우 세력이 기독교의 얼굴인 것처럼 보이게 만든 현실이 너무 슬프네요. 종교가 정치의 도구가 되어선 안 됩니다
( 0 / 500 )
┖ minzzang
5
전광훈 목사 사례를 보면 종교의 이름으로 저질러지는 폭력이 얼마나 위험한지 절감합니다. 이건 종교의 타락입니다
( 0 / 500 )
puma
2
우리나라 기독교는 60~70년대 고도 성장에 맞추어 자본주의와 철저하게 합체되었다. 건설업이 당시 주요 산업이듯이 모든 교회가 건축 헌금을 받으며 대한민국의 아파트 건설과 교회 성장이 같이 했다. 이러한 속내를 글로 날카롭게 비판하셨습니다.
( 0 / 500 )
신고내용

신고내용을 선택해주세요
회원비난/비하/욕설글 및 댓글도배성 게시물저작권 침해/불법자료 유출허위사실유포개인정보 유출.사생활 침해무단광고/홍보음란물 및 도박 불법 광고물범죄행위 관련 글불법행위 관련 소개물품 판매 및 사기글악성코드 및 스파이웨어 유포기타 사유 및 운영진 판단
ID
PasswordShow password
비밀번호를 잊으셨나요?

Sign in with Google
열린국회정보한국매니페스토실천본부열려라국회국회입법예고참여연대참여연대

All information provided by us is free of charge and is for the public good.

ⓒ 2022. P-UM.netRSS